CAT 2024 Slot 3 · VARC · Question 23
CAT 2024 Slot 3 previous year question on RC Inference Questions, with the answer and a step-by-step solution.
RC passage 4: AI and the Operating System of Civilisation — this question belongs to a set. Read the full set with all 4 questions →
The passage below is accompanied by four questions. Based on the passage, choose the best answer for each question.
Fears of artificial intelligence (AI) have haunted humanity since the very beginning of the computer age. Hitherto, these fears focused on machines using physical means to kill, enslave or replace people. But over the past couple of years, new AI tools have emerged that threaten the survival of human civilisation from an unexpected direction. AI has gained some remarkable abilities to manipulate and generate language, whether with words, sounds or images. AI has thereby hacked the operating system of our civilisation.
Language is the stuff almost all human culture is made of. Human rights, for example, aren’t inscribed in our DNA. Rather, they are cultural artefacts we created by telling stories and writing laws. Gods aren’t physical realities. Rather, they are cultural artefacts we created by inventing myths and writing scriptures….What would happen once a non-human intelligence becomes better than the average human at telling stories, composing melodies, drawing images, and writing laws and scriptures? When people think about Chatgpt and other new AI tools, they are often drawn to examples like schoolchildren using AI to write their essays. What will happen to the school system when kids do that? But this kind of question misses the big picture. Forget about school essays. Think of the next American presidential race in 2024, and try to imagine the impact of AI tools that can be made to mass-produce political content, fake news stories and scriptures for new cults…
Through its mastery of language, AI could even form intimate relationships with people, and use the power of intimacy to change our opinions and worldviews. Although there is no indication that AI has any consciousness or feelings of its own, to foster fake intimacy with humans, it is enough if the AI can make them feel emotionally attached to it….
What will happen to the course of history when AI takes over culture, and begins producing stories, melodies, laws and religions? Previous tools like the printing press and radio helped spread the cultural ideas of humans, but they never created new cultural ideas of their own. AI is fundamentally different. AI can create completely new ideas, completely new culture….Of course, the new power of AI could be used for good purposes as well. I won’t dwell on this because the people who develop AI talk about it enough….
We can still regulate the new AI tools, but we must act quickly. Whereas nukes cannot invent more powerful nukes, AI can make exponentially more powerful AI.… Unregulated AI deployments would create social chaos, which would benefit autocrats and ruin democracies. Democracy is a conversation, and conversations rely on language. When AI hacks language, it could destroy our ability to have meaningful conversations, thereby destroying democracy …. And the first regulation I would suggest is to make it mandatory for AI to disclose that it is an AI. If I am having a conversation with someone, and I cannot tell whether it is a human or an AI—that’s the end of democracy. This text has been generated by a human. Or has it?
- APeople’s fears of the dangers of students using ChatGPT and other new AI tools are unfounded.
- BThe commonly expressed fear that future AI developments will fatally harm humans is unfounded.
- CApart from its drawbacks, AI tools have been beneficial in boosting technological and industrial advance worldwide.
- DOne of the biggest casualties from the spread of unregulated AI is likely to be the democratic process.
Answer & solution
Answer: Option D
The author warns that 'unregulated AI deployments would create social chaos, which would benefit autocrats and ruin democracies', and that 'when AI hacks language, it could destroy our ability to have meaningful conversations, thereby destroying democracy'. He ends: if you cannot tell a human from an AI, 'that's the end of democracy'.
Option 4, that democracy is likely to be one of the biggest casualties, matches.
Option 1 overstates. The author says the school-essay worry 'misses the big picture', not that it is unfounded.
Option 2 contradicts him; he believes AI threatens civilisation, just from a new direction.
Option 3 is about technological and industrial benefits. The author declines to discuss AI's benefits ('I won't dwell on this').
Shortcut: for 'most likely to agree' questions, find the claim the author repeats. Democracy comes up three times in the last paragraph.
Hence, the answer is option 4.
More RC Inference Questions questions
- Q3Which one of the following cannot be inferred from Alexandra Schnell’s experiment?CAT 2021 Slot 1 · VARC · RC Inference Questions
- Q6All of the following statements can be inferred from the passage EXCEPT that:CAT 2021 Slot 1 · VARC · RC Inference Questions
- Q7Following from the passage, which one of the following may be seen as a characteristic of a utopian society?CAT 2021 Slot 1 · VARC · RC Inference Questions
- Q14Which one of the following best explains the “additional complexity” that the example of the incense burner…CAT 2021 Slot 1 · VARC · RC Inference Questions
- Q14We can infer all of the following about indigenous languages from the passage EXCEPT that:CAT 2021 Slot 2 · VARC · RC Inference Questions
- Q19The author implies that, like scholars, successful leaders:CAT 2021 Slot 2 · VARC · RC Inference Questions
All RC Inference Questions PYQs →
Take this paper as a timed test
Real exam timing, instant score, rank and topic-wise analysis.