CAT 2021 Slot 1 · VARC · Question 3

CAT 2021 Slot 1 previous year question on RC Inference Questions, with the answer and a step-by-step solution.

RC Inference QuestionsReading Comprehension - Question TypesMultiple choiceMedium

RC passage 1: Cuttlefish and the Marshmallow Test — this question belongs to a set. Read the full set with all 4 questions →

The passage below is accompanied by a set of questions. Choose the best answer to each question.

Cuttlefish are full of personality, as behavioral ecologist Alexandra Schnell found out while researching the cephalopod's potential to display self-control. “Self-control is thought to be the cornerstone of intelligence, as it is an important prerequisite for complex decision-making and planning for the future,” says Schnell . . .

[Schnell's] study used a modified version of the “marshmallow test.” During the original marshmallow test, psychologist Walter Mischel presented children between age four and six with one marshmallow. He told them that if they waited 15 minutes and didn’t eat it, he would give them a second marshmallow. A long-term follow-up study showed that the children who waited for the second marshmallow had more success later in life. The cuttlefish version of the experiment looked a lot different. The researchers worked with six cuttlefish under nine months old and presented them with seafood instead of sweets. (Preliminary experiments showed that cuttlefishes’ favorite food is live grass shrimp, while raw prawns are so-so and Asian shore crab is nearly unacceptable.) Since the researchers couldn’t explain to the cuttlefish that they would need to wait for their shrimp, they trained them to recognize certain shapes that indicated when a food item would become available. The symbols were pasted on transparent drawers so that the cuttlefish could see the food that was stored inside. One drawer, labeled with a circle to mean “immediate,” held raw king prawn. Another drawer, labeled with a triangle to mean “delayed,” held live grass shrimp. During a control experiment, square labels meant “never.”

“If their self-control is flexible and I hadn’t just trained them to wait in any context, you would expect the cuttlefish to take the immediate reward [in the control], even if it’s their second preference,” says Schnell . . . and that’s what they did. That showed the researchers that cuttlefish wouldn’t reject the prawns if it was the only food available. In the experimental trials, the cuttlefish didn’t jump on the prawns if the live grass shrimp were labeled with a triangle—many waited for the shrimp drawer to open up. Each time the cuttlefish showed it could wait, the researchers tacked another ten seconds on to the next round of waiting before releasing the shrimp. The longest that a cuttlefish waited was 130 seconds.

Schnell [says] that the cuttlefish usually sat at the bottom of the tank and looked at the two food items while they waited, but sometimes, they would turn away from the king prawn “as if to distract themselves from the temptation of the immediate reward.” In past studies, humans, chimpanzees, parrots and dogs also tried to distract themselves while waiting for a reward.

Not every species can use self-control, but most of the animals that can share another trait in common: long, social lives. Cuttlefish, on the other hand, are solitary creatures that don’t form relationships even with mates or young. “We don’t know if living in a social group is important for complex cognition unless we also show those abilities are lacking in less social species,” says . . . comparative psychologist Jennifer Vonk.

Which one of the following cannot be inferred from Alexandra Schnell’s experiment?
  1. A
    Cuttlefish exert self-control with the help of diversions.
  2. B
    Intelligence in a species is impossible without sociability.
  3. C
    Cuttlefish exercise choice when it comes to food.
  4. D
    Like human children, cuttlefish are capable of self-control.
Pick an option, then check.
Answer & solution

Answer: Option B

Check each option against what the experiment shows.

Option 1 can be inferred. The cuttlefish sometimes turned away from the king prawn 'as if to distract themselves from the temptation'. That is self-control aided by diversion.

Option 3 can be inferred. Preliminary trials showed a ranking – live grass shrimp first, raw prawn second, Asian shore crab last. So cuttlefish do choose between foods.

Option 4 can be inferred. The experiment adapts the children's marshmallow test, and many cuttlefish waited for the better reward. So, like children, they can exercise self-control.

Option 2 cannot be inferred. The passage says only that most self-controlled animals are social, and Vonk says we do not yet know whether social living matters for complex cognition. In fact, the solitary cuttlefish showing self-control points the other way. 'Impossible' is far too strong.

Shortcut: extreme words like 'impossible' in an inference option are usually the wrong ones, especially when the passage itself is unsure.

Hence, the answer is option 2.

More RC Inference Questions questions

All RC Inference Questions PYQs →

Take this paper as a timed test
Real exam timing, instant score, rank and topic-wise analysis.

Practice timed →