IPMAT Indore 2025 · Verbal Ability · Question 39

IPMAT Indore 2025 previous year question on RC Detail and Fact Based Questions, with the answer and a step-by-step solution.

RC Detail and Fact Based QuestionsReading Comprehension - Question TypesMultiple choiceMedium

RC passage 2: Passage — this question belongs to a set. Read the full set with all 6 questions →

According to the French philosopher Jean Baudrillard, commodities available for consumption are not inherently negative things. Baudrillard tried to interpret consumption in modern societies by engaging with the 'cargo myth' prevalent among the indigenous Melanesian people living in the South Pacific. The Melanesians did not know what aeroplanes were. However, they saw that these winged entities descended from the air for white people and appeared to make them happy. They also noted that aeroplanes never descended for the Melanesian people.

The Melanesian natives noted that the white people had placed objects similar to the aeroplane on the ground. They concluded that these objects were attracting the aeroplanes in the air and bringing them to the ground. Through a magical process, the aeroplanes were bringing plenty to the white people and making them happy. The Melanesian people concluded that they would need to place objects that simulated the aeroplane on the ground and attract them from the air. Baudrillard believes that the cargo myth holds an important analogy for the ways in which consumers engage with objects of consumption.

According to Baudrillard, the modern consumer "sets in place a whole array of sham objects, of characteristic signs of happiness, and then waits for happiness to alight". For instance, modern consumers believe that they will get happiness if they buy the latest available version of a mobile phone or automobile. However, consumption does not usually lead to happiness. While consumers should ideally be blaming their heightened expectations for their lack of happiness, they blame the commodity instead.

They feel that they should have waited for the next version of a mobile phone or automobile before buying the one they did. The version they bought is somehow inferior and therefore cannot make them happy. Baudrillard argues that consumers have replaced 'real' happiness with 'signs' of happiness. This results in the endless deferment of the arrival of total happiness.

In Baudrillard's words, "in everyday practice, the blessings of consumption are not experienced as resulting from work or from a production process; they are experienced as a miracle". Modern consumers view consumption in the same magical way as the Melanesian people viewed the aeroplanes in the cargo myth. Television commercials also present objects of consumption as miracles. As a result, commodities appear to be distanced from the social processes which lead to their production. In effect, objects of consumption are divorced from the reality which produces them.

Why are consumers unhappy with commodities that they have just bought?
  1. A
    Because television commercials do not create enough hype about commodities.
  2. B
    Because they focus on improved functionality of commodities.
  3. C
    Because they have exaggerated expectations of commodities.
  4. D
    Because the Law of Diminishing Marginal Commodities comes into play.
Pick an option, then check.
Answer & solution

Answer: Option C

Line in the passage

Para 3, last sentence — consumers should ideally be blaming their heightened expectations for their lack of happiness, but they blame the commodity instead.

How to reach it, step by step

Step 1. The stem asks for a cause, so find the sentence in the passage that assigns blame.

Step 2. It is the closing line of paragraph 3, and it draws a sharp line between the real cause (heightened expectations) and the misplaced one (the commodity).

Step 3. 'Heightened expectations' and 'exaggerated expectations' are the same idea. Option (c).

Step 4. Confirm with the following lines: the buyer decides the version purchased was inferior and the next one would have delivered. That reaction only makes sense if the expectation was pitched too high to begin with.

Why the other three fall

(a) The passage shows commercials creating too much hype, not too little.

(b) Improved functionality is never discussed. The chase is for the sign of happiness, not for better features.

(d) There is no such law. The Law of Diminishing Marginal Utility exists; 'Diminishing Marginal Commodities' is invented, and nothing from economics is applied in the passage.

Teaching point: Option (d) is an authority trap — an official-sounding term that students accept because it looks technical. Tell them: if a named law or theory appears in an option but never appears in the passage, it is decoration, not evidence.

More RC Detail and Fact Based Questions questions

All RC Detail and Fact Based Questions PYQs →

Take this paper as a timed test
Real exam timing, instant score, rank and topic-wise analysis.

Practice timed →