IPMAT Indore 2025 · Verbal Ability · Question 37

IPMAT Indore 2025 previous year question on RC Detail and Fact Based Questions, with the answer and a step-by-step solution.

RC Detail and Fact Based QuestionsReading Comprehension - Question TypesMultiple choiceMedium

RC passage 2: Passage — this question belongs to a set. Read the full set with all 6 questions →

According to the French philosopher Jean Baudrillard, commodities available for consumption are not inherently negative things. Baudrillard tried to interpret consumption in modern societies by engaging with the 'cargo myth' prevalent among the indigenous Melanesian people living in the South Pacific. The Melanesians did not know what aeroplanes were. However, they saw that these winged entities descended from the air for white people and appeared to make them happy. They also noted that aeroplanes never descended for the Melanesian people.

The Melanesian natives noted that the white people had placed objects similar to the aeroplane on the ground. They concluded that these objects were attracting the aeroplanes in the air and bringing them to the ground. Through a magical process, the aeroplanes were bringing plenty to the white people and making them happy. The Melanesian people concluded that they would need to place objects that simulated the aeroplane on the ground and attract them from the air. Baudrillard believes that the cargo myth holds an important analogy for the ways in which consumers engage with objects of consumption.

According to Baudrillard, the modern consumer "sets in place a whole array of sham objects, of characteristic signs of happiness, and then waits for happiness to alight". For instance, modern consumers believe that they will get happiness if they buy the latest available version of a mobile phone or automobile. However, consumption does not usually lead to happiness. While consumers should ideally be blaming their heightened expectations for their lack of happiness, they blame the commodity instead.

They feel that they should have waited for the next version of a mobile phone or automobile before buying the one they did. The version they bought is somehow inferior and therefore cannot make them happy. Baudrillard argues that consumers have replaced 'real' happiness with 'signs' of happiness. This results in the endless deferment of the arrival of total happiness.

In Baudrillard's words, "in everyday practice, the blessings of consumption are not experienced as resulting from work or from a production process; they are experienced as a miracle". Modern consumers view consumption in the same magical way as the Melanesian people viewed the aeroplanes in the cargo myth. Television commercials also present objects of consumption as miracles. As a result, commodities appear to be distanced from the social processes which lead to their production. In effect, objects of consumption are divorced from the reality which produces them.

What is Baudrillard's position on total happiness?
  1. A
    It results from ethical consumption.
  2. B
    It is perpetually delayed.
  3. C
    It prioritises production over consumption.
  4. D
    It comes with patience and waiting.
Pick an option, then check.
Answer & solution

Answer: Option B

Line in the passage

End of para 4 — this results in the endless deferment of the arrival of total happiness.

How to reach it, step by step

Step 1. The phrase 'total happiness' appears exactly once in the passage. Go straight there instead of reasoning from memory.

Step 2. It appears in a sentence saying the arrival of total happiness is endlessly deferred.

Step 3. 'Endless deferment' and 'perpetually delayed' are the same statement in different vocabulary. Deferred = pushed to a later date; endless = it never stops being pushed.

Step 4. Trace the mechanism in the previous lines so students see why it never arrives: the buyer is let down, decides the next version is the one that will satisfy, buys that, is let down again. The loop has no exit. Option (b).

Why the other three fall

(a) Ethical consumption is never mentioned anywhere in the passage.

(c) It confuses this question with Q45. Production versus consumption belongs to the final paragraph's point about commodities being cut off from how they are made.

(d) The direct reversal trap. Patience and waiting are exactly what fails — the consumer waits for happiness to alight and it does not.

More RC Detail and Fact Based Questions questions

All RC Detail and Fact Based Questions PYQs →

Take this paper as a timed test
Real exam timing, instant score, rank and topic-wise analysis.

Practice timed →