IPMAT Indore 2025 · Verbal Ability · Question 35
IPMAT Indore 2025 previous year question on RC Detail and Fact Based Questions, with the answer and a step-by-step solution.
RC passage 2: Passage — this question belongs to a set. Read the full set with all 6 questions →
According to the French philosopher Jean Baudrillard, commodities available for consumption are not inherently negative things. Baudrillard tried to interpret consumption in modern societies by engaging with the 'cargo myth' prevalent among the indigenous Melanesian people living in the South Pacific. The Melanesians did not know what aeroplanes were. However, they saw that these winged entities descended from the air for white people and appeared to make them happy. They also noted that aeroplanes never descended for the Melanesian people.
The Melanesian natives noted that the white people had placed objects similar to the aeroplane on the ground. They concluded that these objects were attracting the aeroplanes in the air and bringing them to the ground. Through a magical process, the aeroplanes were bringing plenty to the white people and making them happy. The Melanesian people concluded that they would need to place objects that simulated the aeroplane on the ground and attract them from the air. Baudrillard believes that the cargo myth holds an important analogy for the ways in which consumers engage with objects of consumption.
According to Baudrillard, the modern consumer "sets in place a whole array of sham objects, of characteristic signs of happiness, and then waits for happiness to alight". For instance, modern consumers believe that they will get happiness if they buy the latest available version of a mobile phone or automobile. However, consumption does not usually lead to happiness. While consumers should ideally be blaming their heightened expectations for their lack of happiness, they blame the commodity instead.
They feel that they should have waited for the next version of a mobile phone or automobile before buying the one they did. The version they bought is somehow inferior and therefore cannot make them happy. Baudrillard argues that consumers have replaced 'real' happiness with 'signs' of happiness. This results in the endless deferment of the arrival of total happiness.
In Baudrillard's words, "in everyday practice, the blessings of consumption are not experienced as resulting from work or from a production process; they are experienced as a miracle". Modern consumers view consumption in the same magical way as the Melanesian people viewed the aeroplanes in the cargo myth. Television commercials also present objects of consumption as miracles. As a result, commodities appear to be distanced from the social processes which lead to their production. In effect, objects of consumption are divorced from the reality which produces them.
- AProduction and consumption are magical processes.
- BTelevision commercials are at the heart of unhappiness experienced by consumers.
- CMelanesian people coped with the inequality of colonialism by creating myths.
- DConsumers value signs more than the real.
Answer & solution
Answer: Option D
Line in the passage
Para 4 — Baudrillard argues that consumers have replaced 'real' happiness with 'signs' of happiness.
How to reach it, step by step
Step 1. The stem asks what Baudrillard argues, so you need his claim, not the Melanesians' belief and not the passage's background detail.
Step 2. Find the sentence where the author uses the word 'argues'. It sits in paragraph 4: real happiness has been swapped for signs of happiness.
Step 3. A swap of the real for the sign means the sign is now what people pursue — they value it more. That is option (d) exactly.
Step 4. Cross-check against the earlier line about an array of sham objects, characteristic signs of happiness. Same claim, stated twice. Confirmed.
Why the other three fall
(a) Near-miss. The passage says consumption is experienced as a miracle, i.e. it feels magical. Baudrillard does not argue that it is magical — the gap between feeling and being is his entire critique.
(b) Television commercials are offered as one illustration of objects being presented as miracles. An example is not the heart of the argument; the heightened expectations of the consumer are.
(c) Colonialism and coping are the reader's own inference. The passage uses the cargo myth only as an analogy and never explains it as a coping strategy.
More RC Detail and Fact Based Questions questions
- Q34Being deprived of sleep can result inIPMAT Indore 2023 · Verbal Ability · RC Detail and Fact Based Questions
- Q36In what way does sleep contribute to a person’s well-being?IPMAT Indore 2023 · Verbal Ability · RC Detail and Fact Based Questions
- Q43The Apple retail stores in India willIPMAT Indore 2023 · Verbal Ability · RC Detail and Fact Based Questions
- Q29The writer argues that social mediaIPMAT Indore 2025 · Verbal Ability · RC Detail and Fact Based Questions
- Q31Social media has succeeded inIPMAT Indore 2025 · Verbal Ability · RC Detail and Fact Based Questions
- Q33The inherent downside associated with social media is that itIPMAT Indore 2025 · Verbal Ability · RC Detail and Fact Based Questions
All RC Detail and Fact Based Questions PYQs →
Take this paper as a timed test
Real exam timing, instant score, rank and topic-wise analysis.