CAT 2025 Slot 1 · VARC · Question 3

CAT 2025 Slot 1 previous year question on Para Summary, with the answer and a step-by-step solution.

Para SummaryVerbal AbilityMultiple choiceMedium

RC passage 1: Complex Systems, Noise and Tail Events — this question belongs to a set. Read the full set with all 4 questions →

The passage below is accompanied by four questions. Based on the passage, choose the best answer for each question.

Understanding the key properties of complex systems can help us clarify and deal with many new and existing global challenges, from pandemics to poverty . . . A recent study in Nature Physics found transitions to orderly states such as schooling in fish (all fish swimming in the same direction), can be caused, paradoxically, by randomness, or 'noise' feeding back on itself. That is, a misalignment among the fish causes further misalignment, eventually inducing a transition to schooling. Most of us wouldn't guess that noise can produce predictable behaviour. The result invites us to consider how technology such as contact-tracing apps, although informing us locally, might negatively impact our collective movement. If each of us changes our behaviour to avoid the infected, we might generate a collective pattern we had aimed to avoid: higher levels of interaction between the infected and susceptible, or high levels of interaction among the asymptomatic.

Complex systems also suffer from a special vulnerability to events that don't follow a normal distribution or 'bell curve'. When events are distributed normally, most outcomes are familiar and don't seem particularly striking. Height is a good example: it's pretty unusual for a man to be over 7 feet tall; most adults are between 5 and 6 feet, and there is no known person over 9 feet tall. But in collective settings where contagion shapes behaviour – a run on the banks, a scramble to buy toilet paper – the probability distributions for possible events are often heavy-tailed. There is a much higher probability of extreme events, such as a stock market crash or a massive surge in infections. These events are still unlikely, but they occur more frequently and are larger than would be expected under normal distributions.

What's more, once a rare but hugely significant 'tail' event takes place, this raises the probability of further tail events. We might call them second-order tail events; they include stock market gyrations after a big fall and earthquake aftershocks. The initial probability of second-order tail events is so tiny it's almost impossible to calculate – but once a first-order tail event occurs, the rules change, and the probability of a second-order tail event increases.

The dynamics of tail events are complicated by the fact that they result from cascades of other unlikely events. When COVID-19 first struck, the stock market suffered stunning losses followed by an equally stunning recovery. Some of these dynamics are potentially attributable to former sports bettors, with no sports to bet on, entering the market as speculators rather than investors. The arrival of these new players might have increased inefficiencies and allowed savvy long-term investors to gain an edge over bettors with different goals. . . .

One reason a first-order tail event can induce further tail events is that it changes the perceived costs of our actions and changes the rules that we play by. This game-change is an example of another key complex systems concept: nonstationarity. A second, canonical example of nonstationarity is adaptation, as illustrated by the arms race involved in the coevolution of hosts and parasites [in which] each has to 'run' faster, just to keep up with the novel solutions the other one presents as they battle it out in evolutionary time.

Which one of the options below best summarises the passage?
  1. A
    The passage explains how speculative entrants always produce inefficiency after health shocks. Therefore, long-term investors invariably profit when new participants push prices away from fundamentals under pandemic conditions and comparable crises.
  2. B
    The passage explains how noise can create order, then shows why complex systems with contagion are vulnerable to heavy-tailed cascades. It also explains why early shocks change rules through nonstationarity with a market illustration during the COVID-19 disruption.
  3. C
    The passage explains how social outcomes generally follow normal distributions. So, extreme events are negligible, and policy should stabilise averages rather than learn from large shocks in fast-changing collective settings.
  4. D
    The passage explains how nonstationarity works in evolutionary biology and rejects applications in markets or public health because adaptation is exclusive to parasite-host systems and cannot arise in technology-mediated social dynamics.
Pick an option, then check.
Answer & solution

Answer: Option B

A summary must cover the whole arc of the passage, not one paragraph of it. Map the arc first.

Paragraph 1: noise can paradoxically produce order (fish schooling), with contact-tracing apps as the cautionary application. Paragraph 2: complex systems with contagion give heavy-tailed distributions. Paragraph 3: a first-order tail event raises the chance of second-order tail events. Paragraph 4: COVID-19 and the market as an illustration. Paragraph 5: nonstationarity – the rules themselves change.

Option 2 reproduces all four movements: noise creating order, contagion producing heavy-tailed cascades, rules changing through nonstationarity, and the COVID-19 market illustration. It is the only option that spans the passage.

Option 1 takes the single COVID-19 illustration from paragraph 4, turns the passage's hedged 'potentially' into 'always' and 'invariably', and presents that one example as the whole passage. A detail blown up is not a summary.

Option 3 states the reverse of paragraph 2. The passage's entire point is that these distributions are NOT normal and that extreme events are not negligible.

Option 4 is factually wrong about the passage. Nonstationarity is introduced for markets and behaviour first, with host-parasite coevolution added as a second example; nothing is rejected.

Shortcut: a correct summary is usually the option whose clause count matches the paragraph count of the passage. Options that mention only one example, or that reverse the passage's stance, can be dropped without rereading.

Hence, the answer is option 2.

More Para Summary questions

All Para Summary PYQs →

Take this paper as a timed test
Real exam timing, instant score, rank and topic-wise analysis.

Practice timed →