CAT 2024 Slot 1 · VARC · Question 22

CAT 2024 Slot 1 previous year question on RC - Questions, with the answer and a step-by-step solution.

RC - QuestionsReading Comprehension - Question TypesMultiple choiceMedium

RC passage 4: Streaming, Physical Media and Lost Films — this question belongs to a set. Read the full set with all 4 questions →

The passage below is accompanied by four questions. Based on the passage, choose the best answer for each question.

In the summer of 2022, subscribers to the US streaming service HBO MAX were alarmed to discover that dozens of the platform's offerings – from the Covid-themed heist thriller Locked Down to the recent remake of The Witches – had been quietly removed from the service . . . The news seemed like vindication to those who had long warned that streaming was more about controlling access to the cultural commons than expanding it, as did reports (since denied by the show's creators) that Netflix had begun editing old episodes of Stranger Things to retroactively improve their visual effects.

What's less clear is whether the commonly prescribed cure for these cultural ills – a return to the material pleasures of physical media – is the right one. While the makers of Blu-ray discs claim they have a shelf life of 100 years, such statistics remain largely theoretical until they come to pass, and are dependent on storage conditions, not to mention the continued availability of playback equipment. The humble DVD has already proved far less resilient, with many early releases already beginning to deteriorate in quality. Digital movie purchases provide even less security. Any film "bought" on iTunes could disappear if you move to another territory with a different rights agreement and try to redownload it. It's a bold new frontier in the commodification of art: the birth of the product recall. After a man took to Twitter to bemoan losing access to Cars 2 after moving from Canada to Australia, Apple clarified that users who downloaded films to their devices would retain permanent access to those downloads, even if they relocated to a hemisphere where the [content was] subject to a different set of rights agreements. Thanks to the company's ironclad digital rights management technology, however, such files cannot be moved or backed up, locking you into watching with your Apple account.

Anyone who does manage to acquire Digital Rights Management free (DRM-free) copies of their favourite films must nonetheless grapple with ever-changing file format standards, not to mention data decay – the gradual process by which electronic information slowly but surely corrupts. Only the regular migration of files from hard drive to hard drive can delay the inevitable, in a sisyphean battle against the ravages of digital time.

In a sense, none of this is new. Charlie Chaplin burned the negative of his 1926 film A Woman of the Sea as a tax write-off. Many more films have been lost through accident, negligence or plain indifference. During a heatwave in July 1937, a Fox film vault in New Jersey burned down, destroying a majority of the silent films produced by the studio.

Back then, at least, cinema was defined by its ephemerality: the sense that a film was as good as gone once it left your local cinema. Today, with film studios keen to stress the breadth of their back catalogues (or to put in Hollywood terms, the value of their IPs), audiences may start to wonder why those same studios seem happy to set the vault alight themselves if it'll help next quarter's numbers.

"Netflix had begun editing old episodes of Stranger Things to retroactively improve their visual effects." What is the purpose of this example used in the passage?
  1. A
    To show that streaming services are controlling access to the cultural commons rather than expanding it.
  2. B
    To show a practice that justifies the fears of people who feel streaming services cannot be trusted to be custodians of cultural artefacts like film.
  3. C
    To show how unsubstantiated reports are leading to an increase in the level of distrust towards streaming services.
  4. D
    To show that art in the digital age, specifically film, is no longer sacrosanct, and may be changed to suit changing tastes or technology.
Pick an option, then check.
Answer & solution

Answer: Option B

The sentence structure decides this. The passage says the HBO MAX news 'seemed like vindication to those who had long warned that streaming was more about controlling access to the cultural commons than expanding it, as did reports... that Netflix had begun editing old episodes'. 'As did' gives the Netflix report the same role as the HBO MAX news: it too seemed to vindicate the sceptics. It is a practice that bears out the fears of those who distrust streaming services as custodians of film.

Option 2 says this.

Option 1 gives the Netflix example the job of the HBO MAX example. Controlling access is about whether you can watch a title at all; editing is about whether what you watch is still the original.

Option 3 seizes on '(since denied by the show's creators)' and makes the unreliability of the report the point. The author cites it as supporting the sceptics, not as an example of rumour.

Option 4 may be true in general, but it does not say why the author uses the example at this point – to vindicate a stated warning.

Shortcut: in a purpose-of-example question, find the connective that attaches the example to the argument ('as did', 'for instance', 'yet'). It tells you which claim the example supports.

Hence, the answer is option 2.

More RC - Questions questions

All RC - Questions PYQs →

Take this paper as a timed test
Real exam timing, instant score, rank and topic-wise analysis.

Practice timed →