CAT 2023 Slot 1 · VARC · RC passage 4: The Return of Wolves to Lozère
The full passage and all 4 questions (Q21–Q24) from CAT 2023 Slot 1, with answers and solutions.
The passage below is accompanied by four questions. Based on the passage, choose the best answer for each question.
RESIDENTS of Lozère, a hilly department in southern France, recite complaints familiar to many rural corners of Europe. In remote hamlets and villages, with names such as Le Bacon and Le Bacon Vieux, mayors grumble about a lack of local schools, jobs, or phone and internet connections. Farmers of grazing animals add another concern: the return of wolves. Eradicated from France last century, the predators are gradually creeping back to more forests and hillsides. “The wolf must be taken in hand,” said an aspiring parliamentarian, Francis Palombi, when pressed by voters in an election campaign early this summer. Tourists enjoy visiting a wolf park in Lozère, but farmers fret over their livestock and their livelihoods. . . .
As early as the ninth century, the royal office of the Luparii—wolf-catchers—was created in France to tackle the predators. Those official hunters (and others) completed their job in the 1930s, when the last wolf disappeared from the mainland. Active hunting and improved technology such as rifles in the 19th century, plus the use of poison such as strychnine later on, caused the population collapse. But in the early 1990s the animals reappeared. They crossed the Alps from Italy, upsetting sheep farmers on the French side of the border. Wolves have since spread to areas such as Lozère, delighting environmentalists, who see the predators’ presence as a sign of wider ecological health. Farmers, who say the wolves cause the deaths of thousands of sheep and other grazing animals, are less cheerful. They grumble that green activists and politically correct urban types have allowed the return of an old enemy.
Various factors explain the changes of the past few decades. Rural depopulation is part of the story. In Lozère, for example, farming and a once-flourishing mining industry supported a population of over 140,000 residents in the mid-19th century. Today the department has fewer than 80,000 people, many in its towns. As humans withdraw, forests are expanding. In France, between 1990 and 2015, forest cover increased by an average of 102,000 hectares each year, as more fields were given over to trees. Now, nearly one-third of mainland France is covered by woodland of some sort. The decline of hunting as a sport also means more forests fall quiet. In the mid-to-late 20th century over 2m hunters regularly spent winter weekends tramping in woodland, seeking boars, birds and other prey. Today the Fédération Nationale des Chasseurs, the national body, claims 1.1m people hold hunting licences, though the number of active hunters is probably lower. The mostly protected status of the wolf in Europe—hunting them is now forbidden, other than when occasional culls are sanctioned by the state—plus the efforts of NGOs to track and count the animals, also contribute to the recovery of wolf populations.
As the lupine population of Europe spreads westwards, with occasional reports of wolves seen closer to urban areas, expect to hear of more clashes between farmers and those who celebrate the predators’ return. Farmers’ losses are real, but are not the only economic story. Tourist venues, such as parks where wolves are kept and the animals’ spread is discussed, also generate income and jobs in rural areas.
Question 21 · RC Detail and Fact Based Questions
Which one of the following has NOT contributed to the growing wolf population in Lozère?
- A
A decline in the rural population of Lozère.
- B
An increase in woodlands and forest cover in Lozère.
- C
The shutting down of the royal office of the Luparii.
- D
The granting of a protected status to wolves in Europe.
Answer & solution
Answer: Option C
The passage lists the factors behind the wolves' return: rural depopulation (option 1), expanding forests (option 2), the decline of hunting, and the wolf's 'mostly protected status' in Europe (option 4).
Option 3 – the shutting down of the Luparii – is not mentioned as a factor. The Luparii 'completed their job in the 1930s' when the last wolf disappeared; the passage never says that ending the office caused the return.
Shortcut: in 'NOT contributed' questions, check the paragraph that lists causes. Anything mentioned elsewhere (here, history) is a likely distractor.
Hence, the answer is option 3.
Question 22 · RC Detail and Fact Based Questions
- Alack of educational facilities.
- Bpoor rural communication infrastructure.
- Clivestock losses.
- Ddecline in the number of hunting licences.
Answer & solution
Answer: Option D
Residents complain of 'a lack of local schools' (option 1), poor 'phone and internet connections' (option 2), and farmers worry about their livestock (option 3).
Option 4 – a decline in hunting licences – is mentioned as one cause of the wolves' return, not as a problem residents complain about.
Shortcut: match each option to who complains about it. The exception usually appears in the passage, but in a different role.
Hence, the answer is option 4.
Question 23 · Strengthen and Weaken Arguments
- AHaving migrated out in the last century, wolves are now returning to Lozère.
- BUnemployment concerns the residents of Lozère.
- CWolf attacks on tourists in Lozère are on the rise.
- DThe old mining sites of Lozère are now being used as grazing pastures for sheep.
Answer & solution
Answer: Option C
The author ends by arguing that farmers' losses 'are not the only economic story': wolf parks and tourist venues 'also generate income and jobs in rural areas'.
Option 3 – wolf attacks on tourists are rising – would hurt this tourism benefit and weaken the claim.
Option 1 restates what the passage already says.
Option 2 matches residents' existing complaints.
Option 4 concerns grazing land, which does not touch the author's claims.
Shortcut: identify the author's own conclusion (often the last paragraph) and look for an option that attacks its specific mechanism – here, tourism income.
Hence, the answer is option 3.
Question 24 · RC Inference Questions
- Apoliticians and farmers.
- Benvironmentalists and politicians.
- Cfarmers and environmentalists.
- Dtourists and environmentalists.
Answer & solution
Answer: Option C
The issue is the clash between farmers, who lose livestock, and 'those who celebrate the predators' return' – the environmentalists. The author's economic answer is that tourist venues where wolves are kept 'also generate income and jobs', which serves both sides.
Option 3, farmers and environmentalists, is correct.
Politicians (options 1 and 2) and tourists (option 4) are not the competing parties in that conflict.
Shortcut: find the 'clashes between X and Y' sentence. The solution that follows is meant to reconcile X and Y.
Hence, the answer is option 3.
Take this paper as a timed test
Real exam timing, instant score, rank and topic-wise analysis.